Lawsuit Ends Jackson Hobbit Lord of Rings director Peter Jackson will not direct new films in the franchise, producers New Line insisted future contracts include settlement of lawsuit claiming greater share of merchandising profits 21.11.06 Times, Entertainment Law
Wembley Damages Main Wembley contractor Multiplex will pursue damages from steel firm Cleveland Bridge, Judge Rupert Jackson urges direct agreement but concedes breach of contract 07.06.06 BBC, Company Law, Construction Law
Roberts Enigma First day of full hearings fails to bring out hard views - admiration for Justice Jackson's ability to change views, recognition of right to privacy but refusal to pre-judge abortionWashington Post Transcripts 14.09.05 Washington Post, John G. Roberts Links
Jackson's Law Defence team leader Thomas Mesereau, 'Mr Incredible', is likely to have received $500 an hour, total defence cost likely to have exceeded $5m, cost of prosecution over $2mBBC Those fascinating Jackson finances 15.06.05 Guardian, Michael Jackson Links
Jackson Clear Michael Jackson found not guilty on all charges, giving alcohol and sexually molesting child, jury found key prosecution witness, accusers mother, less than credibleReuters Jury gives reasons at press conference 14.06.05 BBC, Michael Jackson Links, Paedophilia Links
Pop Idol Jury in Micahel Jackson trail begins second day of deliberations as atmosphere outside reaches 'frenzy', star 'tearing out his hair' 07.06.05 Reuters, Michael Jackson Links
Michael Jackson Final arguments due to start today, prosecutors will paint picture of den of sex and liquor, defence will show accusers as chancers out for moneyReuters Jurors will be allowed to convict on charge of giving alcohol to minors 02.06.05 Times, Michael Jackson Links
Michael Jackson Defence's last witness, Chris Tucker, paints accuser and family as obssessed with milking the famous, defence case 'effective' but California law gives prosecution advantage 26.05.05 NY Times, Michael Jackson
Jay Leno Comedian called for Jackson does defendent little good, denies being approached for money by accuser, defence expected to rest today 25.05.05 NY Times, Michael Jackson
Wembley Damages Main Wembley contractor Multiplex will pursue damages from steel firm Cleveland Bridge, Judge Rupert Jackson urges direct agreement but concedes breach of contract 07.06.06 BBC, Company Law, Construction Law
Wembley Damages Main Wembley contractor Multiplex will pursue damages from steel firm Cleveland Bridge, Judge Rupert Jackson urges direct agreement but concedes breach of contract 07.06.06 BBC, Company Law, Construction
Lord of the Rings Peter Jackson is suing New Line for $100m, accusation is that Warner sold subsidiary rights to its own companies at well under market rate, challenge to vertical integration of media conglomerates 27.06.05 NY Times, Media Law Links
R v Jackson [2006] EWCA Crim 2380, [2006] WLR (D) 245, CA CrimKeywords
18.10.06
CRIME â Mens rea â Statutory offence â Unlawful low flying â Whether offence of strict liability â Air Force Act 1955, s 51}, R v Jackson [2006] EWCA Crim 2380, A: Hooper LJ, Keith and Lloyd Jones JJ: 17 October 2006 18.10.06Court of Appeal - Civil Division Carillion Construction Ltd Devonport Royal Dockyard Ltd The Master of the Rolls
Lord Justice Chadwick
Lord Justice Moore-Bick
Keywords
16.11.05
[2005] EWCA Civ 1358 Case No: 2005/1070 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF JUDICATURE COURT OF APPEAL (CIVIL DIVISION) ON APPEAL FROM THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE QUEEN'S BENCH DIVISION TECHNOLOGY AND CONSTRUCTION COURT (MR JUSTICE JACKSON) TCC 30/05 HT-05-82 Royal Courts of Justice Strand, London, WC2A 2LL Date: 16/11/2005 Before : THE MASTER OF THE ROLLS LORD JUSTICE CHADWICK and LORD JUSTICE MOORE-BICK Between : CARILLION CONSTRUCTION LIMITED Claimant/Respondent - and - DEVONPORT ROYAL DOCKYARD LIMITED Defendant/Appellant Mr Stephen Furst QC and Miss Louise Randall (instructed by Herbert Smith of Exchange House, Primrose Street, London EC2A 2HS) for the Appellant Mr Nicholas Dennys QC and Mr Simon Lofthouse (instructed by Pinsent Masons of 100 Barbirolli Square, Manchester M2 3SS) for the Respondent Hearing dates : 4 and 5 October 2005 Â
16.11.05Jackson and others (Appellants) v. Her Majesty's Attorney General (Respondent)Keywords
13.10.05
[2005] UKHL 56 13.10.05