16 August 2005

Law Now

http://www.law-now.com

Landlord and Tenant Act

The reforms to the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 which came into force on 1 June 2004 changed the timings for making applications to court for renewal of a business tenancy and permit landlords and tenants to agree extensions of time within which to make applications. In a recent county court case, in which we successfully acted for a landlord, the court considered what constitutes an agreement to extend time, and the consequences of not reaching agreement.

We believe this may be one of the first cases to test these new provisions of the 1954 Act.To ensure its application to the court for a renewal tenancy is valid, a tenant must have commenced proceedings by the date specified in a Section 25 Notice or the day before the date in the Section 26 Request unless the parties have agreed to extend the time for doing so.

If no agreement to extend time is reached and no application to Court is made by this date, the tenancy will come to an end. The tenant will lose its right to a new tenancy and the landlord will be entitled to possession. It is important, therefore, to ensure that the procedural requirements are complied with. A valid agreement to extend time must:

1. be reached after the giving of the notice but before the termination date specified in the notice;

2. be for a specified period - it cannot be a general extension of time; and

3. be in writing.

If no agreement is reached and no application is made, the court will not have any jurisdiction to deal with the renewal tenancy and can strike the claim out.

In our case the tenant sought to argue that a general extension of time had been agreed and that the landlord had waived compliance with the statutory procedures by a general representation in its letter serving a section 25 notice that the landlord would not oppose any application to renew. The court found there could be no general extension of time and that the 1954 Act provided a procedure for extending time that cannot be waived.

The loss by tenants of the right to renew the tenancy will, for landlords, improve their negotiating position, and for tenants result in damage to its business. It is essential, therefore, to diarise the dates and ensure that either an application is made or an agreement entered into.

For more information on this or other 1954 Act queries please contact Danielle Drummond-Brassington on danielle.drummond-brassington@cms-cmck.com or 020 7367 2768 or Caroline DeLaney on caroline.delaney@cms-cmck.com or on 020 7367 2329.

==============

If you would like specific advice, please call your usual contact or the named contact responsible for the issue addressed in this email (see above).

Feedback

If you have any comments on our Law-Now service, please contact:

Michael Yiatanou
Law-Now Administrator 
michael.yiatanou@cms-cmck.com
Tel: +44 (0)20 7367 2106
Fax: +44 (0)20 7367 2000

CMS Cameron McKenna LLP Mitre House 160 Aldersgate Street, London EC1A 4DD www.law-now.com

Copyright (C) 2005 CMS Cameron McKenna LLP. All rights reserved. Information may be shared; however, reproduction in any medium requires our permission.

=============

Disclaimer

This information has been prepared for subscribers to Law-Now - CMS Cameron McKenna's free on-line information service. The information and opinions expressed in all Law-Now emails and our website www.law-now.com are not necessarily comprehensive and do not purport to give professional advice. CMS Cameron McKenna LLP is a limited liability partnership registered in England and Wales whose registered office is Mitre House, 160 Aldersgate Street, London EC1A 4DD. Registered in England, number OC310335 . A list of the names of the members and their professional qualifications is open to inspection at the registered office. The members are either solicitors or registered foreign lawyers. Regulated by the Law Society of England and Wales.

The firm does not accept service by email of court proceedings, other proceedings or formal notices of any kind without specific prior written agreement. The contents of this email (including any attachments) are confidential and may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of its contents is strictly prohibited, and you should please notify the sender immediately and then delete it (including any attachments) from your system. Further information about CMS Cameron McKenna LLP can be found on our website. http://www.law-now.com

=======================

Jobs Now LEGAL DIRECTOR Sought for challenging in-house position with Myspace, the online space which has revolutionized the way people interact, as sole attorney in their London office More >> HEALTHCARE LAWYER With at least 5 years PQE sought by Capsticks, a leading healthcare practice, to drive forward the development of their Birmigham based office More >> PI PARALEGAL Required by Plexus Law, a specialist PI firm, to provide in-house support to the Motor Claims Department in their Folkstone offices More >> NETWORK ENGINEER Sought by Personnel 2000 for their client, an international banking insurance provider, based in the Cayman Islands More >> LEGAL SECRETARY Required by Law Choice for their client, a prestigious US law firm, to work for 2 partners in their Dubai offices More >>

Legalday Related Pages

Contact

Law Now
http://www.law-now.com

More Commentaries From
Law Now

Facebook Firsht
30 July 2008

Trustee Knowledge Update
19 February 2008

EU merger control: compensation for losses due to illegal prohibition decision
13 July 2007

More Commentaries from
Law Now

Author/Firm Profile
Law Now