LegalDay - Legal News and Links Legal Recruitment Legal Forms

No implied term to make PILON
LegalDay - News and Links for UK Law

Morrish vs NTL - PILON - Employment Contract - Implied terms

LegalDay Home Cases CurrentIssues LegalPractice Jobs News SiteMap Search LegalDay Search+

   

Contact   Privacy  Advertise  Use Our Content  Visitor List  Publish on LegalDay  Work for LegalDay  RSS/XML  Add to Google  Add to Yahoo AddThis Social Bookmark Button


Click Here for the Latest Legal News

12 July 2007

Law Now

http://www.law-now.com

No implied term to make PILON

In Morrish V NTL Group Limited (3rd July 2007) the Inner House of the Scottish Court of Session (equivalent to the English Court of Appeal) has confirmed that there is no implied term in an employment contract to make a payment in lieu of notice (PILON).

Mr Morrish was dismissed without being given the 12 months£ written notice required by his employment contract. He claimed damages for breach of contract. His employer, NTL Group Limited, had offered him a payment of salary in lieu of notice which he rejected as he claimed the damages award would be bigger. NTL argued that there was an implied term giving it the right to terminate his contract by making a payment of a proportion of his salary and emoluments corresponding to the period of notice stipulated in the contract.

The Court of Session concluded that such a term should not be implied as it would be manifestly contradictory to the express notice clause. There was no reason for holding that a term should be implied which would have the effect of depriving the employee of the normal remedy of damages for breach of contract, the purpose of which would be to put him in no worse a financial position than that in which he would have been had the employers fulfilled their contractual obligations to him. As a result, it seems that Mr Morrish will succeed in getting an award of damages which will include the bonus he would have earned in the 12 month notice period and so be much more than the payment in lieu of notice NTL offered him.

This case emphasises the importance of having express PILON clauses in employment contracts if employers want to be able to get out of the contract just by paying, for example, fixed salary in lieu of notice. Such clauses should be carefully drafted to set out a clear formula for what is payable, otherwise they will be useless.

For further information, please contact:

 
Simon Jeffreys: simon.jeffreys@cms-cmck.com Partner, Employment London+44 (0)20 7367 3421

Anthony Fincham: anthony.fincham@cms-cmck.com Partner, Employment  London+44 (0) 20 7367 2783




This article first appeared in Law-Now, CMS Cameron McKenna's free
online information service, and has been reproduced with their
permission. For more information about Law-Now, please go to
www.law-now.com.
Contact
Law-Now administrator
law-now.administrator@cms-cmck.com
Tel: 44 (0)20 7367 2106
Fax: 44 (0)20 7367 2000
CMS Cameron McKenna LLP Mitre House 160 Aldersgate Street, London EC1A 4DD
www.law-now.com
Copyright (C) 2005-7 CMS Cameron McKenna LLP. All rights reserved. Information may be shared; however,
reproduction in any medium requires our permission.




Legal Day Table cris
Jobs Now

Pharma Business Counsel We have some exciting openings within the legal team to support our ever growing business, in Hertfordshire. More >>

Employment Solicitor You will act for a broad range of existing clients with a particular emphasis on clients in the education and public sectors, Newcastle.
More >>

Restructuring Partner and is looking to recruit an additional partner to work on high profile and complex restructuring matters, in the City.
More >>

Head of Marketing We are looking to recruit an experienced marketing manager to deliver the firm's marketing strategy, London.
More >>

Senior Litigation Executives To work as part of the Legal team, managing a caseload, Yorkshire.
More >>


Contact

Law Now
http://www.law-now.com

More Commentaries From
Law Now

Trustee Knowledge Update
19 February 2008

EU merger control: compensation for losses due to illegal prohibition decision
13 July 2007

Comparative advertising ? a human right
13 July 2007

More Commentaries from
Law Now


Author/Firm Profile
Law Now

Legalday Home Recently On LegalDay Browse Archives By Date Disclaimer

© Day x Day Media Ltd 2006 - All worldwide rights strictly reserved